Greptile Summary

This PR adds a new OTPField component backed by @base-ui/react's OTPFieldPreview, and bumps @base-ui/react from 1.3.0 to 1.4.1 to unlock it.

• New otp_field.py: Implements OTPFieldRoot, OTPFieldInput, OTPFieldSeparator, and a HighLevelOTPField convenience wrapper that auto-generates Input slots; the wrapper validates that length is a static integer when no children are provided, but skips that check when children are explicitly passed, leaving a path where the required length prop can be silently omitted.
• base_ui.py version bump: The PACKAGE_VERSION change from 1.3.0 to 1.4.1 is package-wide and upgrades the pinned dependency for all existing Base UI components (accordion, avatar, dialog, etc.) simultaneously, not just the new OTP field.
• __init__.py: otp_field is registered correctly in the lazy-loader mapping.

Confidence Score: 3/5

The new OTP field logic is mostly sound, but two issues make this worth pausing on before merge: the high-level wrapper can produce a component missing its required length prop, and the shared version bump touches every existing Base UI component in the package.

The HighLevelOTPField.create path that accepts explicit children forwards all props to OTPFieldRoot.create without checking for the required length prop, so callers who provide children but omit length will silently render a broken component. The version bump in base_ui.py is cross-cutting and upgrades the pinned @base-ui/react for every component in the package with no re-testing evidence noted in the PR.

otp_field.py (the children + length validation gap) and base_ui.py (the package-wide version bump).

Important Files Changed

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
    A["otp_field(…)"] --> B{"children provided?"}
    B -- "No" --> C{"length is int?"}
    C -- "No" --> D["raise TypeError"]
    C -- "Yes" --> E["length > 0? (no guard currently)"]
    E -- "generate N OTPFieldInput slots" --> F["OTPFieldRoot.create(children, **props)"]
    B -- "Yes" --> G{"length in props?\n(no validation)"}
    G -- "Yes" --> F
    G -- "No (silent)" --> H["OTPFieldRoot.create(children)\nlength=undefined → runtime error"]
    F --> I["Rendered OTPField in DOM"]

_{Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "add otp field to reflex components inter..." | Re-trigger Greptile}

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 24 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 2 skipped benchmarks¹

_{Comparing carlos/otp-field (b9d915e) with main (1ffc3b5)}